Pneumatic Golf Ball Launcher Designer

Design and optimize your pneumatic launcher with real physics calculations

0 ft
Max Distance

Trajectory

0
Muzzle Vel (ft/s)
0
Range (ft)
0
Max Height (ft)
0
Impact Angle (°)
0
Flight Time (s)
ft

Calculated Results

Muzzle Velocity
0 ft/s
Maximum Distance
0 ft
Time in Barrel
0 ms
Flight Time
0 s
Max Height
0 ft
Exit Pressure
0 psi
Impact Angle
0 °
Muzzle Energy
0 J
Chamber:Barrel
0 :1
Seal Efficiency
0 %
Min Effective PSI
20 psi
Valve Efficiency
0 %
Exit Acceleration
0 g

Projectile : Golf Ball

TypeDiameterMassCd
Golf Ball42.67 mm45.93 g0.24
Tennis Ball66 mm57 g0.50
Ping Pong40 mm2.7 g0.50
Nerf Dart13 mm1.0 g0.40

Barrel : 1.5" x 36"

36"
6" 72"
Golf Ball Fit: SDR 21 @ 1.5" has 1.720" ID - provides ~0.040" clearance for a 1.680" golf ball. Ideal for minimal friction while maintaining air seal.
Seal Efficiency: 95%Excellent seal with minimal blow-by

Chamber : 2" x 24"

24"
6" 48"
80
20 150

Valve : QEV 1/2"

Valve TypeSizeCvOpen Time
QEV1/4"0.803 ms
QEV3/8"1.503 ms
QEV1/2"3.403 ms
QEV3/4"6.504 ms
QEV1"10.005 ms
Sprinkler (Mod)3/4"2.00*30 ms
Sprinkler (Mod)1"3.50*25 ms
Sprinkler3/4"1.50*55 ms
Sprinkler1"2.80*50 ms

* Sprinkler Cv values are effective values accounting for internal flow restrictions

Barrel Curve & Spin : 0 RPM

0" (straight)
0 6"
36" (full)
6" 36"
0.35
0.1 (slick) 0.8 (grippy)
2000
0 5000
Magnus Effect: Backspin creates lift force that extends flight distance. Higher spin = more lift, but also more drag.

Optimization

Find the launch angle that maximizes distance with current settings.

Runs all variable sweeps for the selected goal and shows comparison charts

Valve Flow Comparison

Flow rate comparison at different pressure differentials. QEVs provide significantly faster flow due to larger effective orifice and minimal internal restrictions.

Pressure vs. Velocity

Velocity increases roughly with square root of pressure. Current operating point shown in red.

Pipe Reference Data

Nominal Size OD (in) ID (in) Wall (in) Pressure (psi) Projectile Fit

Physics Reference GGDT Comparison Guide →

Core Equations (Adiabatic)

Exit Pressure:
Pexit = P0 × (V1/V2)γ

Adiabatic Work:
W = P0V1/(γ-1) × [1-(V1/V2)γ-1]

Muzzle Velocity:
v = √(2E / m)

Where:
γ = 1.4 (air)
V1 = chamber + dead space
V2 = V1 + barrel volume

Magnus Lift Force

Lift Force:
FL = ½ × CL × ρ × A × v²

Spin Factor:
S = ω × r / v

Where:
CL = lift coefficient ≈ 0.5 × S
ρ = air density (1.225 kg/m³)
A = cross-sectional area
ω = angular velocity (rad/s)
r = ball radius (m)

Valve Efficiency

Transit Time:
ttransit = 2L / v (approx)

If ttransit ≥ topen:
ηv = 0.5×(topen/ttransit) + (1 - topen/ttransit)

If ttransit < topen:
ηv = ttransit / (2 × topen)

Cv Factor:
ηcv = min(1, √(Cv/5))

Trajectory

Drag Force:
FD = ½ × Cd × ρ × A × v²

Where:
Cd = drag coefficient
ρ = air density (1.225 kg/m³)
A = cross-sectional area (m²)
v = velocity (m/s)

Optimal angle: 30-40° with drag

Blow-by / Seal Efficiency

Gap Ratio:
rgap = (Abar - Aproj) / Aproj

Flow Competition Model:
η varies by gap regime (0.02-0.40)
Tighter fits → higher efficiency

Threshold Pressure:
Pmin = 20 + (rgap × 80) psi
Below threshold: η² penalty

Where:
Abar = barrel cross-section
Aproj = projectile cross-section
P = operating pressure (psi)
η = ηbase × ηdyn (total)

Effective Energy

Muzzle Energy:
E = W × (Aproj/Abar) × ηseal

Effective Energy:
Eeff = E × ηvalve × ηtype

Where:
W = adiabatic work (J)
ηseal = blow-by efficiency
ηvalve = valve open fraction
ηtype = 0.75 sprinkler, 1.0 QEV